Air Montenegro Adopts AI to Enhance Competitiveness

GetJet Aviation Holdings Reports €25.4 Million Net Profit for 2024 GetJet Aviation Holdings, a Lithuania-based international aviation services group, has announced a net profit of €25.4 million for the 2024 fiscal year, with total revenues amounting to €184.3 million across its portfolio. The group remains one of the most profitable entities globally within the ACMI (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance) and aircraft maintenance sectors. Strategic Expansion and Operational Diversification The company’s CEO, Darius Viltrakis, described 2024 as a year of strategic consolidation, marked by significant expansion into aviation asset management, maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), and component trading. Alongside these developments, GetJet strengthened its in-house technical capabilities, which Viltrakis credits for the improved financial stability and operational diversification observed throughout the year. This integrated approach has fostered increasing synergies across the group’s various business units. GetJet Aviation Holdings operates through several key subsidiaries, including GetJet Airlines in Lithuania and its branches in Latvia and Malta, the aviation asset management and maintenance provider Airhub Aviation, and the training center Airhub Training. This vertical integration allows the group to cover all core aviation segments, encompassing ACMI operations, MRO services, component trading, aircraft asset management, and aviation training. Focus on Technical Autonomy and Growth Aircraft maintenance remains central to GetJet’s long-term growth strategy. In response to a tightening global MRO market, the company has prioritized technical autonomy to maintain operational efficiency and resilience. Viltrakis emphasized that the establishment of Airhub Aviation in 2023 was a deliberate move to build internal technical capabilities, granting the group greater control over its operational pace. This strategy has preserved both service flexibility and profitability amid increasing maintenance capacity constraints. Looking ahead, GetJet plans to reinvest profits to further expand its technical self-sufficiency and grow its aircraft fleet. Airhub Aviation currently operates an MRO facility at Siauliai International Airport (SQQ) and intends to open maintenance services to third-party clients in 2025, thereby diversifying the group’s income streams. In a significant development, GetJet Airlines secured a 40-year lease at Vilnius International Airport in March 2025 to construct a €10 million state-of-the-art maintenance hangar. Scheduled to become operational by 2028, this facility will serve as a strategic engineering hub, enhancing the group’s operational independence and supporting sustainable growth. Market Challenges and Competitive Positioning Despite these strong financial results, GetJet faces a competitive and evolving market environment. The aviation sector continues to exhibit cautious sentiment, particularly within the business jet segment, while competitors may respond with strategic or operational adjustments. Broader economic trends and the performance of other industry players, such as Tokyo Steel Manufacturing’s recent net profit decline, could also impact market dynamics and future profitability. Currently, GetJet operates a fleet of 16 aircraft. Its subsidiary, GetJet Airlines, is noted for its rapid response capabilities, able to deploy a fully crewed aircraft within 90 minutes of a client request—a capability that has earned it the nickname “special forces of aviation.” As the group continues to invest in technical infrastructure and operational flexibility, it aims to sustain its competitive advantage amid shifting industry conditions.

Delta Air Lines Advances AI-Driven Pricing Amid Privacy Concerns Delta Air Lines is expanding its use of artificial intelligence (AI) to determine flight prices, asserting that it does not employ personal data to charge customers different fares. The airline has partnered with Israeli startup Fetcherr to implement an AI-driven pricing system, which it expects will set 20% of its fares by the end of the year. However, Fetcherr’s earlier promotional materials highlighted the potential for AI to enable “hyper-personalization that drives revenue growth,” a phrase that was quietly removed from its website earlier this month. Fetcherr’s Shift Away from Hyper-Personalization An archived version of a Fetcherr blog post titled “Dynamic Pricing in Aviation: How AI is Revolutionizing Airline Revenue Management” included a dedicated section on “Hyper-Personalization at Scale.” The company described leveraging factors such as customer lifetime value, past purchase behaviors, and the real-time context of booking inquiries to craft “a truly personalized offer.” The post emphasized understanding each customer as an individual and optimizing every interaction to maximize value. This section has since been deleted from the blog. Thrifty Traveler confirmed that the original post was taken offline over a weekend and subsequently republished on July 22 with minor edits, including an updated publish date, a corrected spelling error, an added parenthesis, and notably, the removal of the personalized airfare section. The exact timing of the deletion remains unclear, with the last online record of the original post dated July 1. Industry and Regulatory Reactions Delta’s AI-driven pricing strategy attracted attention after President Glen Hauenstein disclosed to investors that the airline was using AI to set 3% of its domestic fares. This announcement sparked concerns about the potential use of personal data to impose higher prices on certain customers. In response, Delta issued a statement firmly denying any use of personal information in fare-setting, now or in the future. A Delta spokesperson stated, “There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing, or plans to use that targets customers with individualized offers based on personal information or otherwise. A variety of market forces drive the dynamic pricing model that’s been used in the global industry for decades, with new tech simply streamlining this process. Delta always complies with regulations around pricing and disclosures.” Despite these reassurances, Delta faces increasing scrutiny from lawmakers and consumer advocacy groups concerned that AI-driven, individualized pricing could result in higher fares for some travelers. The prospect of “personalized” pricing has raised alarms in Washington and among passengers worried about potential unfair targeting. The Broader Implications for the Airline Industry The airline industry and market observers are closely monitoring Delta’s AI pricing initiatives. Competitors may adopt similar AI-based strategies to remain competitive or may criticize Delta’s approach to defend their own pricing models. As AI continues to transform airline revenue management, debates over transparency, fairness, and regulatory oversight in airfare pricing are expected to intensify.

How Delta’s AI Pricing Could Impact the Cost of Flying Current Trends in Airfare Pricing Despite widespread perceptions of rising travel costs, flying today is more affordable than it has been in years. Nominal airfares, unadjusted for inflation, are approximately 12% lower than they were in February 2020. Over the same period, the overall consumer price index has increased by 24%, creating a significant disparity between general inflation and airfare costs. When adjusted for inflation, airfares are now 41% cheaper than a decade ago, with June 2025 marking the second-lowest month ever recorded for inflation-adjusted fares. Delta’s AI Initiative and Industry Response Amid this backdrop, Delta Air Lines has introduced artificial intelligence to assist in setting ticket prices, a development that has attracted scrutiny from lawmakers and consumer advocates. Delta’s president, Glen Hauenstein, described the AI system as “a super analyst” operating continuously to optimize fares. As of late 2024, AI was applied to roughly 1% of Delta’s fares, with plans to expand this dynamic pricing model to cover up to 20% of domestic fares by the end of 2025. This expansion has raised concerns about potential increases in airfare and reduced pricing transparency. Critics, including Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona, have labeled the approach as “predatory pricing” and pledged to challenge what they consider unfair practices. Consumer advocacy groups have also expressed apprehension about AI-enabled individualized pricing, warning that it could result in less predictable and potentially higher costs for travelers. The Evolution and Complexity of Airfare Pricing Dynamic pricing in the airline industry is not a novel concept. Prior to deregulation in the late 1970s, airfares were fixed, typically at six cents per mile. Deregulation allowed airlines to set their own prices, leading to a significant reduction in fares and making air travel accessible to a broader population. Today, more than half of Americans fly annually, a stark contrast to the era when flying was predominantly a luxury for the wealthy. Over time, airfare pricing has shifted from standardized rates to dynamic models that fluctuate by the week, day, or even hour. While this evolution has generally lowered prices, it has also introduced complexity and confusion for consumers. It is common for passengers on the same flight to pay vastly different amounts for identical seats, with some flights featuring over a hundred distinct ticket prices. Implications of AI-Driven Pricing The integration of AI into this already intricate pricing system has intensified debate. Proponents argue that AI-powered dynamic pricing can help airlines optimize seat occupancy and potentially reduce costs further. However, critics caution that this technology may exacerbate price volatility and diminish transparency. AI-driven individualized pricing could obscure what constitutes a fair fare, potentially leading to higher costs for certain travelers. As Delta and other carriers continue to adopt AI-based pricing strategies, the broader consequences for consumers and the future of dynamic pricing across industries remain uncertain. For the foreseeable future, travelers should anticipate ongoing fluctuations in airfare, with technological advancements playing an increasingly influential role in determining ticket prices.

Commercial Electronic Flight Bag Market Projected to Reach $12.4 Billion by 2034 The global Commercial Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) market is set for substantial growth, with forecasts indicating its value will reach approximately $12.39 billion by 2034. This expansion is largely driven by the aviation sector’s ongoing digital transformation, as airlines and pilots increasingly adopt advanced, paperless cockpit solutions designed to improve operational efficiency and flight safety. Market Growth and Key Drivers In 2024, the EFB market is valued at $7.06 billion and is expected to increase to $7.47 billion by 2025, maintaining a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% through 2032. The transition toward digital cockpits is a primary catalyst for this growth. EFBs, typically deployed as tablets or integrated avionics systems, are replacing traditional paper-based manuals and charts. These digital tools streamline pre-flight, in-flight, and post-flight operations, enabling airlines to reduce fuel consumption, minimize paper usage, and enhance cockpit resource management. Beyond operational cost savings, the adoption of paperless workflows supports sustainability efforts by decreasing aircraft weight and reducing environmental impact. Technological Advancements and Industry Adaptation Technological innovation is a significant driver behind the increasing adoption of EFBs. Modern devices offer real-time data synchronization, integrated GPS, live weather updates, performance analytics, and seamless connectivity with ground operations. The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) technologies facilitates predictive analytics and automation, further optimizing flight management processes. Additional functionalities such as electronic logbooks, fuel monitoring, and pilot training tools have become essential features for commercial airlines. The aviation industry’s embrace of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies has further enhanced EFB capabilities by enabling connectivity with broader aircraft systems. This integration allows for real-time data collection and monitoring, improving decision-making and safety for flight crews. Regulatory Environment and Market Challenges Regulatory bodies, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), have been instrumental in promoting EFB adoption by establishing clear certification guidelines and operational frameworks. These regulatory efforts have facilitated the global shift toward digital flight deck solutions while ensuring compliance with stringent safety standards. Despite these advances, the market faces several challenges. Maintaining regulatory compliance remains complex as standards continue to evolve. Technical difficulties in integrating EFBs with existing aviation systems persist, and rapid technological advancements by competitors necessitate ongoing innovation. To address these challenges, industry participants are increasing investments in research and development, forming strategic partnerships, and enhancing product capabilities to remain competitive. Competitive Landscape and Market Outlook Competition within the EFB market is intensifying, with companies employing aggressive pricing strategies, expanding feature sets, and pursuing strategic acquisitions to secure or grow their market share. The emphasis on flight data analytics and operational efficiency is driving both regulatory agencies and airlines to adopt advanced EFB systems that align with evolving industry requirements. As global air traffic recovers and airline fleets expand, demand for sophisticated, integrated EFB solutions is expected to rise. The sustained growth of the market reflects the aviation industry’s commitment to digital transformation, operational excellence, and enhanced cockpit safety.

Essential Turbines Inc. Acquires AeroMaritime Mediterranean, Establishes European MRO Hub Essential Turbines Inc. (ETI) has completed the acquisition of AeroMaritime Mediterranean Ltd. (AML), a Malta-based Rolls-Royce authorized maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) center. This strategic move marks ETI’s significant expansion into the Euro-Mediterranean region and establishes its first European MRO hub under the new entity, Essential Turbines Malta. The acquisition complements ETI’s existing North American operations and enhances its global service network. Expansion of Capabilities and Strategic Growth With over 45 years of industry experience, Essential Turbines Malta brings a skilled team of 36 MRO professionals and comprehensive AMROC capabilities, including a 1,000 shp test cell and a propeller test stand. These assets are expected to strengthen ETI’s service offerings and operational capacity. Gannon Gambeski, president of ETI, described the acquisition as a pivotal development, emphasizing the company’s commitment to scalable and strategic growth. He highlighted the integration of the Malta team as a continuation of the strong foundation previously established under ITP Aero. This acquisition aligns with ETI’s long-term strategy to consolidate its leadership in Rolls-Royce RR250/300 engine platforms, advance strategic engine programs through partnerships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and expand its MRO capabilities and regional presence through targeted acquisitions. For customers, the establishment of the European hub promises improved proximity and agility in service delivery across Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. ETI has assured that current service levels will be maintained, with integration efforts focused on enhancing consistency, collaboration, and value across all locations. Challenges and Market Implications The expansion into Europe introduces new challenges for ETI, including navigating complex regulatory compliance requirements and ensuring seamless operational integration between its North American and Maltese teams. Additionally, the company faces intensified competition from established European MRO providers, who may respond by enhancing their own service offerings or expanding their market reach. Despite these challenges, industry observers suggest that ETI’s expansion could attract increased investor interest, reflecting the company’s clear commitment to growth and internationalization. Elias Lebovits, managing partner of Swift Anchor Holdings and ETI’s lead shareholder, underscored the company’s investment in people, platforms, and global reach as key to scaling its mission. He described the acquisition of Essential Turbines Malta as a significant milestone in ETI’s evolution as a high-performance MRO partner to leading operators and OEMs worldwide. As ETI integrates its new European hub, the company aims to leverage its expanded footprint to deliver enhanced value to customers and reinforce its position in the global MRO market.

Boeing Projects Need for 710,000 New Aircraft Technicians by 2044 Boeing’s 2025 Pilot and Technician Outlook reveals a pressing global demand for 710,000 new commercial aviation maintenance technicians over the next two decades. This projection highlights the increasing pressure on maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations, as well as training providers, to cultivate a workforce equipped to meet future challenges. The forecast estimates that nearly one-third of the 2.4 million new aviation personnel required worldwide by 2044 will be maintenance technicians, underscoring their essential role amid expanding air traffic and a growing global fleet. Drivers of Technician Demand and Regional Needs The anticipated surge in technician demand is largely attributed to the expansion of single-aisle aircraft fleets. Boeing estimates that approximately two-thirds of these new hires will replace retiring technicians, while the remaining third will support the introduction of new aircraft into service. Regional breakdowns reveal substantial needs across all continents, with North America requiring 123,000 technicians, Eurasia 165,000, China 131,000, Southeast Asia 78,000, South Asia 45,000, Africa 24,000, Latin America 42,000, the Middle East 63,000, Northeast Asia 27,000, and Oceania 12,000. While the outlook for technicians remains strong, Boeing’s report notes a modest decline in demand for pilots and airline technicians, indicating a potential shift in industry priorities. This evolving landscape is expected to drive airlines, MRO providers, and competitors to increase investments in training and education programs aimed at addressing the technician shortfall. Industry players may respond by expanding advanced training facilities and establishing new partnerships to secure a steady pipeline of skilled labor. Training Innovation and Industry Implications Boeing’s forecast arrives amid heightened scrutiny of its production processes, particularly following the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation into the Alaska Airlines incident. This ongoing inquiry may influence market dynamics, prompting Boeing and its competitors to reassess workforce strategies and training standards in light of regulatory and reputational considerations. The report also emphasizes the urgent need to modernize training frameworks. The integration of virtual, mixed, and augmented reality technologies is expected to accelerate technician learning and enable the practice of complex procedures within immersive environments. As MRO operations become increasingly data-driven and technologically sophisticated, stakeholders are encouraged to invest not only in recruitment but also in agile training systems capable of adapting to the evolving skill requirements of future aviation technicians. With the global aviation sector confronting workforce shortages alongside rising regulatory demands, Boeing’s projection serves as a critical call to action. The industry must prioritize comprehensive training and workforce development to ensure the safe and efficient maintenance of an expanding global fleet.

Senators Raise Concerns Over Delta’s AI-Driven Airfare Pricing Delta Air Lines, headquartered in Atlanta, is under increasing scrutiny from U.S. senators regarding its expanding use of artificial intelligence (AI) to determine airfare prices. Lawmakers have expressed apprehension that this technology could enable individualized pricing strategies, potentially resulting in higher fares for certain customers. These concerns have sparked a broader debate about transparency and fairness in airline pricing practices. Delta has firmly denied that its AI systems target customers based on personal information. A company spokesperson emphasized that “there is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized offers based on personal information or otherwise.” Instead, the airline asserts that its AI algorithms incorporate factors such as route demand, flight timing, customer demand, jet fuel prices, and other operational data to set fares. Expansion of AI Pricing and Industry Context Currently, Israeli startup Fetcherr manages pricing for approximately 3% of Delta’s domestic flights, a notable increase from 1% last November. Delta President Glen Hauenstein informed investors that the airline aims to extend AI-driven pricing to cover 20% of its domestic schedule by the end of the year. Hauenstein described the rollout as a “heavy testing phase,” expressing optimism about the technology’s performance while emphasizing a cautious approach to avoid unintended consequences. He also noted that Delta is already observing improved “unit revenues” as a result of the AI implementation. The airline’s expansion of AI pricing has drawn criticism from lawmakers and consumer advocacy groups concerned about the potential for opaque fare structures and the risk of disadvantaging certain travelers. Despite Delta’s assurances that personal identifiers are not used, the possibility of individualized pricing has intensified calls for greater regulatory oversight and transparency. Laurie Garrow, director of the Air Transportation Lab at Georgia Tech, highlighted that Delta is not unique in adopting AI for airfare pricing. She pointed out that Fetcherr also provides services to other carriers, including Delta’s partners WestJet and Virgin Atlantic. The Air Transportation Lab, which collaborates with airlines including Delta on revenue management research, is increasingly focusing on AI as it becomes more prevalent across the industry. AI’s Impact on Pricing Models and Consumer Experience Garrow explained that traditional airline pricing relies on fare “buckets,” where prices increase incrementally as lower-priced seats sell out. In contrast, AI enables more sophisticated and dynamic pricing decisions. For instance, if a booking appears to be for a leisure trip involving a Saturday night stay, the algorithm may detect greater price sensitivity and offer a discount to secure the sale, rather than immediately raising the fare. To date, Garrow noted, there is no evidence that AI pricing systems utilize personal data such as gender, age, ZIP code, or IP address. Instead, pricing adjustments are more likely influenced by factors like booking timing and travel patterns. Additionally, international privacy regulations and concerns about public backlash against perceived price gouging serve as constraints on how airlines deploy AI in fare setting. As Delta and other carriers continue to expand their use of AI in pricing strategies, the ongoing debate over transparency, fairness, and consumer protection is expected to intensify.

Lockheed Martin Reports Significant Decline in Q2 2025 Profits and Cash Flow Lockheed Martin Corporation announced a substantial decrease in profits and cash flow for the second quarter of 2025, despite a modest rise in sales. The defense giant recorded sales of $18.2 billion, a slight increase from $18.1 billion in the same quarter last year. However, net earnings plummeted to $342 million, or $1.46 per share, compared to $1.6 billion, or $6.85 per share, in the second quarter of 2024, marking an approximate 80% decline in profitability. Factors Contributing to Profit Decline The sharp drop in profits was primarily driven by a $1.6 billion loss associated with ongoing difficulties in a classified aeronautics program. Additional pressures included the loss of the U.S. Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) sixth-generation fighter contract and the potential restructuring of two international helicopter programs within the Sikorsky division. The company also recorded $169 million in other charges during the quarter, which further weighed on its financial performance. Cash flow from operations experienced a marked deterioration, falling to $201 million from $1.9 billion a year earlier. Free cash flow turned negative at $150 million, down from $1.5 billion in the same period last year. Lockheed Martin attributed this decline mainly to increased working capital requirements, including higher receivables and contract assets related to the F-35 program, elevated inventory levels at Sikorsky, and billing cycle effects on national security space program contracts. Additional financial burdens included a $66 million write-off of fixed assets following the Air Force’s NGAD contract decision and $103 million in charges related to uncertain tax positions stemming from proposed IRS adjustments on manufacturing contract accounting methods. Company Response and Market Reaction In response to these challenges, Lockheed Martin has initiated measures aimed at addressing issues within its classified aeronautics program and the Sikorsky international helicopter programs. The disappointing quarterly results prompted a sharp market reaction, with the company’s shares falling more than 8% as investors expressed concern over the financial impact and the outlook for future performance. While competitor responses remain uncertain, the defense industry may witness shifts in market dynamics as other firms react to Lockheed Martin’s setbacks and navigate their own strategic challenges and opportunities.

Avocado55 Introduces AI-Driven Claims Service for Aviation Avocado55 has launched Air Claim Solutions (AirCS), the aviation industry’s first artificial intelligence-powered claims service, designed to revolutionize how airlines manage flight delay and cancellation claims. The announcement was made at the recent APEX FTE EMEA and Ancillary & Retailing events, where Xavier Orr, Aviation Practice Lead at Avocado55, outlined the company’s commitment to leveraging technology to enhance customer experience and operational efficiency. Transforming Claims Management with AI AirCS aims to simplify the traditionally complex and time-consuming process of handling flight disruption claims by employing AI to reduce risk, lower costs, and accelerate processing times for airlines globally. The service was developed in partnership with AI workflow automation experts Lokulus and international law firm Clyde & Co, ensuring a comprehensive and legally robust solution. Orr emphasized the company’s ambition to expand AirCS’s capabilities beyond flight disruptions to include baggage claims, personal injury, and more complex complaints in the future. Avocado55’s approach reflects a broader strategy to stay ahead of evolving customer expectations through continuous technological innovation. “Technology continues to underpin the delivery of the best experiences,” Orr stated, highlighting the company’s focus on identifying innovations that deliver tangible improvements for clients. Challenges and Industry Response Despite its potential, the integration of AI-powered claims processing presents significant challenges. Airlines often operate on legacy systems, making seamless integration complex. Moreover, transparency and explainability in AI decision-making are critical, particularly as regulators and customers increasingly demand accountability. Addressing biases within AI models and ensuring stringent data security and privacy standards remain key concerns. The market’s response to AirCS has been mixed. Some traditional insurers have expressed skepticism regarding the rapid adoption of AI in claims management. Competitors such as Aon, which recently introduced its own AI-powered Broker Copilot for commercial insurance, are intensifying their focus on AI capabilities while emphasizing safety and ethical considerations. Industry experts underscore the necessity of robust governance frameworks to ensure responsible AI deployment. Leveraging Experience to Navigate Aviation’s Complexities Avocado55’s extensive experience in the aviation sector positions it well to address the industry’s unique operational demands. Orr noted, “We understand the scale and demands of the operation as we have years of experience working for airlines.” By drawing on best practices from other industries, the company seeks to harmonize operational efficiency with enhanced passenger experiences, asserting that these objectives are complementary rather than conflicting. Building a strong operational foundation, Avocado55 aims to enable airlines to deliver consistent service while reallocating resources toward future innovation. Orr concluded by reaffirming the company’s confidence in AirCS’s benefits and its dedication to advancing both efficiency and customer satisfaction amid the rapidly evolving aviation landscape.

ACIA and GE Aerospace Forge Maintenance Partnership ACIA Aero Leasing (ACIA), a prominent provider of regional aircraft leasing and management services, has formalized a TrueChoice agreement with GE Aerospace to secure maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) support for its CF34-10E engines. This collaboration is designed to support ACIA’s expansion of its Embraer E1 regional jet platform, allowing the company to acquire and lease Embraer E1 jets with a comprehensive engine maintenance framework in place. Strategic Expansion and Enhanced Leasing Solutions Mark Dunnachie, Senior Vice President Commercial at ACIA, emphasized the strategic importance of the E1 E-Jet platform as a complement to the company’s existing turboprop fleet. He expressed confidence that the partnership with GE Aerospace would strengthen ACIA’s capacity to provide competitive leasing options to its airline customers, enhancing the company’s market position. GE Aerospace’s TrueChoice services offer an extensive range of maintenance and customization options throughout the engine lifecycle. By leveraging advanced data analytics alongside decades of industry expertise, these services aim to simplify maintenance processes, reduce service interruptions, and boost operational efficiency for aircraft operators. Industry Context and Market Implications The agreement arrives amid rising demand for aftermarket maintenance services, driven in part by ongoing delays in aircraft deliveries. This surge presents operational challenges for both ACIA and GE Aerospace, potentially necessitating an increase in resources to meet customer requirements. The intensified activity in the aftermarket sector is also prompting competitors to upgrade their maintenance offerings, indicating a potential shift in the competitive landscape. Market analysts have observed that GE Aerospace’s stock may benefit from the deal, reflecting investor confidence in the company’s expanding service portfolio. Nonetheless, broader industry factors remain influential, including recent developments in trade policy such as the U.S. decision to lift license suspensions on GE’s jet engine shipments to China’s COMAC, which could affect future market dynamics. Headquartered in Ireland with offices in France, the United Kingdom, and South Africa, ACIA manages a fleet of nearly 70 regional passenger and freighter aircraft leased to operators across more than 22 countries. Since its establishment in 2004, the company has built a reputation for delivering turnkey leasing solutions, ranging from dry leasing to charter operations, through strategic partnerships. This latest agreement highlights the shared commitment of ACIA and GE Aerospace to provide innovative and flexible solutions in regional aircraft leasing and engine support, positioning both companies to better navigate a rapidly evolving aviation market.