image

Smarter email, faster business.

Auto-tag, parse, and respond to RFQs, quotes, orders, and more — instantly.

Enhancing Predictive Maintenance for Aircraft Engines Using Survival Analysis

November 4, 2024
Image

The aviation industry relies heavily on predictive maintenance to keep operations smooth, safe, and cost-effective. One of the most effective tools for this is survival analysis, which estimates the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of aircraft engines. Using historical maintenance and failure data, survival analysis can help MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) teams plan proactive maintenance before failures occur, potentially saving costs and improving aircraft uptime. In this article, we will walk through how to use survival analysis with Python’s Lifelines library to estimate engine RUL and make data-driven maintenance decisions.

Introduction

Why Use Survival Analysis for Predictive Maintenance?

Survival analysis originated in healthcare for estimating patient survival times, but it can be applied to any domain where you need to predict "time-to-event." In aviation, "time-to-event" might refer to predicting the time until an engine failure or the next necessary maintenance interval. Using survival analysis for predictive maintenance provides several advantages:

  1. Proactive Repairs: Estimate engine lifespan to prevent unplanned downtime.
  2. Optimized Maintenance Intervals: Schedule maintenance based on actual usage and historical data instead of fixed intervals.
  3. Cost Reduction: Minimize costly reactive maintenance by intervening before critical failures.

Survival Analysis Basics: The Kaplan-Meier Estimator

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is one of the most common tools in survival analysis. It calculates the probability of survival past a given time point, accommodating censored data (cases where an event, such as failure, has not yet occurred). This is ideal for MRO teams, as they can estimate survival probabilities for engines still in service and project future maintenance needs.

Let’s dive into the code!

Step 1: Setting Up Your Environment

First, make sure you have the necessary Python packages installed. You’ll need the pandas and lifelines libraries.

pip install pandas lifelines

Step 2: Calculating Survival Probabilities with the Kaplan-Meier Estimator

We can now use the Kaplan-Meier estimator from the lifelines library to analyze the survival probabilities of the engines. This estimator will help predict the likelihood that an engine will continue to operate beyond certain hours.

from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Instantiate the KaplanMeierFitter model
kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()

# Fit the model using the data
kmf.fit(durations=engine_df['Operating_Hours'], event_observed=engine_df['Event'])
# Plot the survival function plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) kmf.plot_survival_function() plt.title("Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimate for Engine Life") plt.xlabel("Operating Hours") plt.ylabel("Survival Probability") plt.grid() plt.show()

The survival function plot gives us a clear view of how the probability of survival decreases as operating hours increase. Each drop in the curve represents an observed failure, while the steady segments represent periods with no failure events.

Step 3: Interpreting the Kaplan-Meier Results

The Kaplan-Meier curve indicates the probability of an engine surviving past certain operating hours. For example, if the curve shows a survival probability of 0.8 at 3,000 hours, this means there’s an 80% chance an engine will continue running beyond 3,000 hours. These insights allow MRO teams to schedule maintenance before reaching critical failure points.

Step 4: Estimating the Mean Survival Time for Predictive Maintenance

The mean survival time provides an estimate for when most engines will require maintenance or may fail. This can guide decisions on maintenance intervals.

# Get the mean survival time (expected lifetime) mean_survival_time = kmf.median_survival_time_
print(f"Estimated Median Survival Time: {mean_survival_time} hours")

This result tells us the estimated number of operating hours after which 50% of engines are expected to require maintenance.

Step 5: Advanced Scenario – Comparing Engine Types

If your dataset contains multiple engine types, you can compare survival curves across these groups. For example, we can add a column for Engine_Type and compare the survival estimates for different types.

# Update dataset with Engine Types for comparison engine_df['Engine_Type'] = ['A', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B']
# Instantiate Kaplan-Meier model
kmf_a = KaplanMeierFitter()
kmf_b = KaplanMeierFitter()

# Fit and plot survival function for Engine Type A plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) kmf_a.fit(engine_df[engine_df['Engine_Type'] == 'A']['Operating_Hours'], event_observed=engine_df[engine_df['Engine_Type'] == 'A']['Event'], label='Engine Type A') kmf_a.plot_survival_function() # Fit and plot survival function for Engine Type B kmf_b.fit(engine_df[engine_df['Engine_Type'] == 'B']['Operating_Hours'], event_observed=engine_df[engine_df['Engine_Type'] == 'B']['Event'], label='Engine Type B') kmf_b.plot_survival_function() plt.title("Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimate by Engine Type") plt.xlabel("Operating Hours") plt.ylabel("Survival Probability") plt.legend() plt.grid() plt.show()

Comparing survival curves across engine types reveals if one type generally lasts longer than another, helping MRO teams decide on procurement, prioritizing resources, or adjusting maintenance intervals based on engine characteristics.

Step 6: Using Survival Analysis to Make Maintenance Recommendations

Using survival analysis, we can set maintenance intervals based on survival probabilities rather than fixed schedules. For example, if the survival probability drops significantly at 4,000 hours, maintenance could be scheduled around that time to minimize the risk of failure.

# Calculate survival probability at a specific time time_point = 4000 survival_prob_at_time_point = kmf.predict(time_point)
print(f"Survival Probability at {time_point} operating hours: {survival_prob_at_time_point:.2f}")

This result gives a survival probability at the specified time, helping you identify critical maintenance points. If the probability is low, maintenance should ideally occur before this threshold.

Conclusion

Survival analysis offers MRO teams powerful insights for proactive, data-driven maintenance planning. By estimating the remaining useful life of engines, we can avoid unexpected failures and optimize the timing of maintenance tasks. While we’ve shown the Kaplan-Meier estimator here, survival analysis includes more advanced techniques (like Cox proportional hazards models) for complex predictive maintenance scenarios.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Proactive Maintenance: Estimate engine lifespans to prevent unexpected failures.
  2. Data-Driven Decisions: Make maintenance decisions based on actual engine usage and survival probabilities.
  3. Cost Optimization: Reduce costs by avoiding reactive maintenance and optimizing parts procurement.

Predictive maintenance is a game-changer in aviation, allowing airlines and MRO teams to improve efficiency and reliability. At ePlaneAI, we specialize in leveraging advanced ML models like survival analysis to transform MRO operations and keep your aircraft in the air.

0comments
Latest Articles

June 15, 2025

Vector DB. Unlock Aviation’s Unstructured Intelligence.

Vector databases index high-dimensional embedding vectors to enable semantic search over unstructured data, unlike traditional relational or document stores which use exact matches on keywords. Instead of tables or documents, vector stores manage dense numeric vectors (often 768–3072 dimensions) representing text or image semantics. At query time, the database finds nearest neighbors to a query vector using approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search algorithms. For example, a graph-based index like Hierarchical Navigable Small Worlds (HNSW) constructs layered proximity graphs: a small top layer for coarse search and larger lower layers for refinement (see figure below). The search “hops” down these layers—quickly localizing to a cluster before exhaustively searching local neighbors. This trades off recall (finding the true nearest neighbors) against latency: raising the HNSW search parameter (efSearch) increases recall at the cost of higher query time .

Image

June 15, 2025

Supply Chain Portal. One Seller. Many Buyers. Total Control.

The Aviation Supply Chain Portal is essentially a private e‑commerce platform tailor-made for aviation suppliers and their customers . Designed exclusively for airlines, MROs, and parts distributors, it centralizes inventory, procurement, and supplier collaboration into one secure system . In practice, an OEM or parts distributor “white‑labels” this portal and invites its approved buyers (airlines, MROs, etc.) to log in. These buyers see a full catalog of parts (synced in real time from the seller’s ERP) and can search, filter, and compare items just as they would on a large online marketplace . Unlike open public exchanges, however, this portal is private – only the one supplier (with many buyers) is on the platform, giving the company complete control over pricing, stock, and user access .

Image

June 14, 2025

Schedule AI. Real-Time Optimization of MRO Scheduling.

Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) scheduling in aviation and manufacturing involves allocating skilled technicians, tools, parts, and hangar space to maintenance tasks under tight time constraints. Traditional methods (manual or legacy ERP planning) struggle with unpredictable breakdowns and diverse task requirements . In today’s “smart era,” AI-driven scheduling systems consider a wide range of variables – technician skills, certifications, location, parts availability, etc. – to create optimal work plans . For example, modern AI schedulers “consider countless variables — skills, certifications, location, parts availability — to create the most efficient plan,” learning from past jobs to optimize future schedules . Schedule AI applies this concept to MRO by continuously analyzing live data and using machine learning to predict, allocate, and optimize maintenance tasks in real time .

Image

June 14, 2025

Inventory AI. Predict Every Aviation Part Need.

Data Engineering and Preparation for Inventory AI

Effective Inventory AI starts with a robust data pipeline. All relevant data from enterprise systems and external sources must be aggregated, cleaned, and transformed for AI consumption. This includes inventory data (historical sales, current stock levels, part attributes) and demand drivers (market trends, maintenance schedules, promotions, etc.) . By integrating internal ERP records with external factors (e.g. industry trends or seasonal patterns), the model gains a comprehensive view of demand influencers . Key steps in the data pipeline typically include:

  • Data Extraction & Integration: Pull data from ERP systems (e.g. SAP, Oracle, Quantum) and other sources (supplier databases, market feeds). The platform supports automated connectors to various aviation systems, ensuring smooth data inflow . For example, historical usage, lead times, and open orders are merged with external data like global fleet utilization or macroeconomic indicators.
  • Data Transformation & Cleaning: Once ingested, data is cleaned and standardized. This involves handling missing values, normalizing units (e.g. flight hours, cycles), and structuring data into meaningful features. Custom transformations and data warehouse automation may be applied to prepare AI-ready datasets. The goal is to create a unified data model that captures the state of inventory (on-hand quantities, locations, costs) and contextual variables (e.g. demand covariates, vendor lead times).
  • Data Loading into the Cloud: The prepared data is loaded into a scalable cloud data platform. In our architecture, Snowflake is used as the central cloud data warehouse, which can ingest batch or real-time streams and handle large volumes of transactional data. Snowflake’s instant elasticity allows scaling storage and compute on-demand, so even massive ERP datasets and forecasting features are processed efficiently . This cloud-based repository serves as the single source of truth for all downstream analytics and machine learning.
  • Business-Specific Fine-Tuning: A crucial preparation step is aligning the data and model parameters with each aviation business’s nuances. Every airline or MRO may have unique consumption patterns, lead-time constraints, and service level targets. The Inventory AI system “fine-tunes” its models to the client’s historical data and business rules, effectively learning the organization’s demand rhythms and inventory policies. This could involve calibrating forecasting models with a subset of the company’s data or adjusting optimization constraints (like minimum stocking levels for critical AOG parts). By tailoring the AI to the business, the predictions and recommendations become far more accurate and relevant to that client’s operations.

Continuous Data Updates: Inventory AI is not a one-off analysis – it continuously learns. Data pipelines are scheduled to update frequently (e.g. daily or hourly), feeding new transactions (sales, shipments, RFQs, etc.) into the model. This ensures the AI always bases decisions on the latest state of the inventory and demand. Automated data quality checks and monitoring are in place to catch anomalies in the input data, so that garbage data doesn’t lead to bad predictions. In summary, a solid foundation of integrated, clean data in the cloud enables the AI models to perform optimally and adapt to changes over time.

Image
More Articles
Ask AeroGenie