
Smarter email, faster business. Auto-tag, parse, and respond to RFQs, quotes, orders, and more — instantly.
Trending
Comparing Costs of the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350

Comparing Costs of the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350
The Airbus A350 and Boeing 787 Dreamliner stand as two of the most advanced widebody aircraft in commercial aviation today. Representing the latest generation of long-haul airliners, these twin-aisle jets offer significant operational improvements over older models. With the Boeing 777X yet to enter service, the A350 and 787 have become the primary options for airlines seeking modern, efficient aircraft for extended routes. Both families have attracted substantial interest, with the 787 securing nearly 2,000 orders and the A350 surpassing 1,000. The 787 entered service first in 2011 with All Nippon Airways (ANA), while the A350 followed in 2015 with Qatar Airways. Consequently, the 787 has nearly double the number of deliveries compared to the A350 as of early 2025.
Although these aircraft share many technological advancements, they are not direct equivalents. The A350 is generally larger and offers greater range, reflecting Airbus’s strategy to position it as a competitor not only to the 787 but also to the larger Boeing 777 family. In typical two-class configurations, the 787 seats between 248 and 336 passengers depending on the variant. The A350-900 accommodates 300 to 350 passengers, while the larger A350-1000 seats between 350 and 410 across three classes. Airlines often consider both models when updating their long-haul fleets, weighing factors such as capacity, range, and cost.
Pricing and Operational Considerations
Boeing 787 Dreamliner Pricing
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is offered in three variants: the 787-8, 787-9, and 787-10. The 787-8 measures 186 feet in length, seats 248 passengers in a two-class layout, and has a range of 7,305 nautical miles. The 787-9 extends to 206 feet, accommodates 296 passengers, and offers a range of 7,565 nautical miles. The largest variant, the 787-10, is 224 feet long, seats 336 passengers, but has a shorter range of 6,330 nautical miles.
According to the latest valuations from the International Bureau of Aviation (IBA), Boeing’s list prices stand at $248.3 million for the 787-8, $292.5 million for the 787-9, and $338.4 million for the 787-10. These figures serve as starting points for negotiations, with airlines typically securing substantial discounts—sometimes exceeding 50 percent—particularly for large orders. The final price depends on various factors including order size, customization, after-sales support, and financing arrangements.
Airbus A350 Pricing and Market Position
Airbus employs a similar pricing approach for the A350, with list prices serving as a baseline for negotiations. The A350’s sticker price is generally higher than that of the 787, reflecting its larger size and extended range capabilities, especially in the A350-1000 variant. However, actual transaction prices are often significantly lower after discounts and incentives are applied.
The higher upfront cost of the A350 corresponds to its appeal for airlines operating premium, ultra-long-haul routes where efficiency and passenger comfort are paramount. Market trends indicate that airlines frequently favor the A350 for these demanding routes despite its higher acquisition cost, valuing its superior range and capacity.
Operational and Cost Considerations
While the Boeing 787 typically commands a lower upfront cost compared to the Airbus A350, both aircraft families offer comparable operational costs in terms of fuel efficiency and maintenance. The A350’s advantage lies in its greater range and seating capacity, making it the preferred choice for airlines targeting long-haul, high-yield markets.
In essence, the Boeing 787 is generally less expensive to acquire, but the Airbus A350’s enhanced capabilities and market appeal—particularly for premium, long-range operations—often justify its higher price for many carriers. The ultimate decision between the two models depends on an airline’s specific route network, capacity requirements, and long-term strategic objectives.