
Умная почта, быстрый бизнес. Автоматически помечайте, анализируйте и отвечайте на запросы, котировки, заказы и многое другое — мгновенно.
В тренде
Categories
The Risks of Personalized Pricing

The Risks of Personalized Pricing
The Emergence of AI-Driven Pricing Strategies
During Amazon’s recent Prime Day, a notably steep discount on my regular underwear purchase initially felt like a reward for my loyalty. However, revelations that Delta Air Lines is employing artificial intelligence to tailor flight prices prompted a reconsideration: was my Amazon deal genuinely special, or merely a reflection of a broader shift toward hyper-personalized pricing?
Delta’s CEO, Glen Hauenstein, has been transparent about the airline’s transition to AI-based pricing models. At last year’s Investor Day, he outlined a comprehensive overhaul of Delta’s pricing approach, promising fares customized “on that flight, on that time, to you, the individual.” Recently, Hauenstein disclosed that this technology is already active on 3 percent of Delta’s flights, with ambitions to extend it to 20 percent by the end of the year.
This development marks the advent of hyper-personalized pricing, where companies utilize AI to process thousands of real-time data points—including location, loyalty status, device type, and search history—to offer identical products at varying prices to different consumers. This represents an advanced iteration of dynamic pricing, a practice long used to adjust prices based on market demand. Yet, the integration of AI and extensive personal data has transformed it into what critics term “surveillance pricing.”
Privacy Concerns and Regulatory Responses
The implications of this trend are profound. Consumers are growing increasingly uneasy about the use of their personal data to determine individualized prices, raising significant privacy and data security issues. The complexity inherent in deploying sophisticated algorithms also introduces risks such as technical errors and potential biases embedded within pricing models. Public reaction has been largely skeptical, with many viewing these practices as unfair and lacking transparency.
In response, lawmakers have begun to intervene. Representative Greg Casar recently announced intentions to propose federal legislation banning surveillance pricing. Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, in a letter co-signed by Senators Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal, accused Delta of exploiting AI to identify and maximize consumer vulnerabilities. Additionally, New York has enacted legislation aimed at enhancing transparency in pricing practices.
Industry Dynamics and Ethical Considerations
The competitive landscape is closely monitoring these developments. Some companies may adopt similar AI-driven pricing strategies to maintain market position, while others might advocate for regulatory measures to shield consumers from perceived exploitation. Concurrently, brands that utilize customer data for personalization are increasingly emphasizing ethical standards and transparency to mitigate backlash and preserve consumer trust.
As businesses accelerate their adoption of AI in pricing, the tension between innovation, fairness, and privacy remains unresolved. For consumers seeking to avoid the reach of personalized pricing, the most effective strategy may be to minimize their digital footprint and online traceability.

Evolution Airways Expands Citation Fleet, Considers ERJ and CRJ Jets

Elevate MRO Begins Offering Gogo Installations Through Industry Partnerships

European Startup Claims Narrow-Body Electric Aircraft Is Feasible

KM Airlines to Sue Pilots’ Union Over Software Dispute

AerSale’s AerAware EFVS Receives Canadian Approval

Hybrid Propulsion Engines Poised to Transform Sustainable Aviation by 2025

IUA Urges New Insurance Approaches for Autonomous Aviation

Nigeria's Cally Air Takes Delivery of First CRJ1000 Aircraft

Parliament Reviews Uganda Air Cargo Aircraft Deal
