
AeroGenie — Your Intelligent Copilot.
Trending
Categories
Training Flight Forced to Land in Field Due to Fuel Starvation

Training Flight Forced to Land in Field Due to Fuel Starvation
A training flight near Moberly, Missouri, was compelled to make an emergency landing in a field after a Piper PA-32-300 experienced engine failure caused by fuel starvation, according to a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report released in September 2023.
Sequence of Events and Investigation Findings
The flight instructor involved in the incident reported conducting a visual inspection of the fuel levels in each tank prior to departure but did not use a dipstick for precise measurement. He estimated approximately 17 gallons of fuel on board, calculating that the planned flight would require about 8 gallons. Approximately 10 miles from the destination, with the fuel selector positioned on the right main tank, the engine began to run roughly. Switching to the right auxiliary tank temporarily restored engine performance; however, as the aircraft neared the airport—around four miles out—the engine again lost power. Attempts to regain power by cycling through the remaining fuel tanks were unsuccessful, forcing the instructor to execute a forced landing in a nearby field. The aircraft sustained significant fuselage damage, and the engine ceased operation during the landing.
Post-accident examination revealed no evidence of fuel leaks and confirmed that the main tanks were devoid of usable fuel. The left auxiliary tank still contained approximately seven gallons. Investigators found no mechanical malfunctions that would have impeded normal engine operation. The NTSB concluded that the probable cause of the accident was inadequate fuel management by the instructor, which led to fuel starvation and total engine power loss during the approach phase.
Broader Implications for Aviation Safety
This incident highlights the critical importance of thorough preflight fuel checks and diligent fuel management, issues that remain central to aviation safety across all sectors. Similar operational oversights have been underscored in recent high-profile investigations, such as those involving the F-35 fighter jet program. The F-35 crash inquiry, for instance, has drawn attention to the necessity of rigorous hydraulic fluid contamination checks, which may increase operational costs and cause delays. Such scrutiny over safety and reliability can influence market perceptions and prompt competitors to emphasize advancements in propulsion and other critical systems.
Concurrently, Boeing’s ongoing efforts under CEO Kelly Ortberg to stabilize operations and restore trust may indirectly affect perceptions of competitors like Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer of the F-35, particularly regarding safety and reliability. As the aviation industry continues to evolve, incidents like the Missouri training flight serve as important reminders of the fundamental need for operational diligence, both in general aviation and advanced military programs.
The NTSB’s report is intended as an educational resource to assist pilots and industry professionals in learning from past incidents and reinforcing best practices in flight safety and aircraft management.

Aerospace and Defense Executives Warn of Ongoing Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

ABM Industries’ Aviation Partnership Signals Broader Innovation Strategy

Singapore Airlines 737 MAX Business Class Review

Wizz Air Grounds Two A321XLR Aircraft and Cuts Future Orders

The Enduring Legacy of the Boeing 747 in Aviation Engineering

UPS, FedEx ground dozens of aircraft at Boeing’s recommendation

China’s Low-Altitude Economy Expands with Air Taxis and Drone Deliveries

Report Details Fiery History of McDonnell Douglas MD-11’s CF6 Engine

Supreme Court Rules Pilot Not Liable in Air India AI171 Crash
