Can Superalloy Techniques Resolve Aircraft Engine Issues in Sixth-Generation Fighters?

India Reports 65 In-Flight Engine Shutdowns Since 2020 India has experienced 65 in-flight engine shutdowns since 2020, according to data obtained by the *Times of India* through a Right to Information (RTI) request submitted to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). These incidents, which occurred during both take-off and mid-air operations, reveal ongoing technical difficulties confronting Indian airlines, averaging nearly one engine shutdown per month. Distress Calls and Technical Challenges Between January 2024 and May 2025, the data indicates that there were 11 "Mayday" distress calls from aircraft cockpits, excluding the recent Air India AI-171 crash in Ahmedabad on June 12 and a diverted IndiGo domestic flight. Mayday calls, reserved for life-threatening emergencies, highlight the severity of the technical problems faced by flight crews. Notably, four of these distress calls led to emergency landings at Hyderabad airport. Experts attribute these engine shutdowns to a variety of technical issues, including blocked fuel filters, fuel contamination, interrupted fuel supply, turbine malfunctions, and the ingestion of foreign objects into the engine. Capt C S Randhawa, president of the Federation of Indian Pilots, explained that these factors can abruptly halt flight operations, posing significant risks to safety. Despite these challenges, pilots have successfully managed to land all affected aircraft safely by relying on the remaining operational engine. However, the recent Air India crash has intensified scrutiny of aviation safety in the country. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau’s preliminary report suggests that pilot confusion over engine switch operations contributed to the accident, adding complexity to the ongoing safety concerns. Regulatory Response and Industry Impact The increased attention on Air India’s fleet is expected to prompt more rigorous safety inspections and regulatory oversight, which may lead to flight delays and cancellations. This heightened scrutiny, coupled with the publicized incidents, has generated passenger anxiety and could potentially affect the airline’s market share. Competitors are likely to respond by emphasizing their own safety protocols and issuing public reassurances to maintain customer confidence. Anil Rao, secretary of the Airline Pilots’ Association of India, underscored the gravity of Mayday calls, stating that flight crews initiate such calls only in critical emergencies, including aircraft fires, engine failures, or other situations posing imminent danger that necessitate immediate landing or grounding. AX Joseph, director of air safety at the DGCA, affirmed the regulator’s role in issuing civil aviation requirements and safety notices to ensure compliance and maintain safe operations across the sector. While in-flight engine shutdowns and Mayday calls are not unique to India, the country’s global aviation safety ranking remains a concern. The International Civil Aviation Organisation currently ranks India 48th in its worldwide safety oversight mechanism, raising questions about the robustness of the nation’s aviation safety standards amid increasing operational and regulatory challenges.

Call for Full Disclosure of AI Flight 171 Cockpit Audio Transcript The recent incident involving AI Flight 171 has ignited a contentious debate, particularly following strong objections from the Indian pilots’ association. The association criticized the preliminary report for what it described as unfair insinuations against the flight crew. Concurrently, certain Western media outlets have speculated about possible confusion in the cockpit, implying pilot error as a contributing factor. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), in its initial findings, appeared to suggest this possibility but refrained from making explicit accusations. Notably, the AAIB’s report included only two paraphrased sentences from the pilots’ cockpit exchange, omitting the full audio transcript and raising significant concerns about transparency. Unresolved Operational Details and Safety Concerns Critical details surrounding the incident remain unclear. First officer Clive Kunder, aged 32, was at the controls during the event, with the pilot-in-command, Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, overseeing operations. It has not been established which pilot questioned the other regarding the shutdown of the fuel switches. The first fuel switch was turned off at 1:38:42 pm, but the crew took approximately ten seconds to reactivate it—a delay that has attracted scrutiny. Furthermore, the fuel supply to the second engine was restored four seconds after the first, rather than simultaneously. While the first engine responded promptly, the second continued to experience difficulties. These operational uncertainties are compounded by prior concerns raised by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which had flagged potential issues with Boeing’s fuel switch locking mechanism as early as 2018. The maintenance history of the fuel switches on this specific aircraft remains undisclosed. Calls for Transparency Amid Ongoing Investigation There is a growing demand for the AAIB to release the full transcript of the cockpit audio. Advocates argue that only complete transparency can dispel suspicions that the preliminary report was crafted to assign blame to the pilots, who tragically cannot defend themselves. Full disclosure is also seen as essential to provide some measure of closure to the victims’ families, even as the final investigation report may take up to a year to be completed. However, the release of the full transcript presents challenges. The investigation remains active, and legal considerations may restrict the immediate publication of sensitive audio recordings. Beyond legalities, the aviation industry is closely monitoring Air India’s response, with heightened scrutiny on its operational protocols and safety standards. Rival airlines are reportedly reviewing their own safety procedures and may increase pressure on Air India to demonstrate full transparency. At present, no definitive conclusions have been drawn regarding the cause of the crash. The insistence on releasing the full cockpit transcript highlights the broader imperative for openness and accountability, both to ensure a fair investigation and to restore public confidence in aviation safety.

Archer Aviation CFO Resigns Following Yearlong Medical Leave Archer Aviation has announced the resignation of its Chief Financial Officer, Mark Mesler, effective July 7. Mesler had been on medical leave since September 2023, and his departure was confirmed in a recent securities filing by the Santa Clara-based electric air taxi developer. During his absence, Priya Gupta served as acting CFO and principal financial officer, and she will continue in this interim capacity. Chief Accounting Officer Harsh Rungta will also remain in his current role. In a company statement, Archer expressed gratitude for Mesler’s contributions and noted that his decision to step down followed careful personal and professional reflection. Strategic Context Amid Leadership Transition Mesler’s resignation occurs at a critical juncture for Archer Aviation as it seeks to solidify its position in the emerging electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft market. The company has forged significant partnerships, including collaborations with United Airlines and Palantir, the latter focusing on AI-driven aviation software development. Archer’s Midnight eVTOL aircraft recently commenced test flights in Abu Dhabi, with plans to broaden its testing program in the region to support certification and commercialization efforts in the UAE and other strategic markets. Additionally, the company is expanding its Launch Edition program in Indonesia, underscoring its global ambitions. The transition agreement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission outlines that Mesler will receive a one-time cash payment equivalent to nine months of his base salary plus three months of his target annual bonus, alongside accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock units. In 2024, Mesler’s compensation package included a $500,000 base salary, a $146,311 bonus, and approximately $1.1 million in stock awards. Gupta’s total compensation as acting CFO amounted to $676,970, comprising a $338,000 base salary and a $158,548 annual non-equity incentive bonus. Industry Dynamics and Investor Confidence This leadership change comes amid heightened investor scrutiny of the air taxi sector, which continues to grapple with regulatory and safety challenges. Recent developments by the Federal Aviation Administration, including the finalization of rules governing “powered lift” aircraft, indicate growing regulatory momentum and expanding opportunities for eVTOL companies. Archer’s progress has attracted significant investor interest, exemplified by ARK Invest’s recent $40 million purchase of Archer Aviation stock, signaling confidence in the company despite the CFO transition. Maintaining investor trust and operational stability will be essential for Archer as it competes with rivals such as Joby Aviation, which has also advanced its test flight programs. The competitive environment is further intensified by Boeing’s appointment of a seasoned aerospace CFO, highlighting the critical role of strategic leadership in this rapidly evolving sector. Archer Aviation’s ongoing expansion and high-profile partnerships position it as a prominent contender in the race to commercialize electric air taxis, even as it navigates leadership changes and a complex regulatory landscape.

Europe Aircraft ACMI Leasing Market: Trends and Forecasts 2025–2032 The Europe Aircraft ACMI (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance) leasing market is set to experience substantial growth through 2032, driven by shifting airline operational requirements, technological progress, and a heightened focus on sustainability. As airlines contend with variable demand and increasing operational complexities, ACMI leasing has become a vital mechanism, enabling carriers to swiftly adjust capacity in response to seasonal fluctuations, unexpected demand surges, or temporary aircraft shortages. Market Overview and Growth Projections The European ACMI leasing market is projected to expand significantly, reaching an estimated value exceeding USD 8.31 billion by 2032, up from USD 5.49 billion in 2024. The market is expected to grow by USD 5.72 billion in 2025 alone, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% from 2025 to 2032. This robust growth reflects airlines’ increasing reliance on flexible fleet management strategies amid economic uncertainties and evolving regulatory landscapes. Key Market Drivers Operational flexibility remains a primary driver of the ACMI leasing market, as it allows airlines to efficiently scale their operations while mitigating risks associated with aircraft ownership and fleet management. Technological advancements, including enhanced flight management systems, improved communication technologies, and sophisticated data analytics, are further optimizing ACMI operations by reducing costs and enhancing efficiency. Additionally, sustainability initiatives are encouraging airlines to utilize ACMI leasing to access newer, more fuel-efficient aircraft, thereby supporting efforts to reduce carbon emissions and comply with environmental regulations. The ACMI model also plays a critical role in crisis response, facilitating rapid deployment of aircraft and personnel during humanitarian emergencies and natural disasters. Market Structure and Definitions The ACMI leasing market comprises various leasing arrangements tailored to different operational needs. Wet leases involve the lessor providing the aircraft, crew, maintenance, and insurance, while the lessee is responsible for fuel and operational fees. Dry leases consist solely of the aircraft provision, with the lessee managing crew, maintenance, and insurance. Damp leases represent a hybrid model, typically including aircraft, maintenance, and insurance, with optional crew provision. Hybrid leases are customized agreements that combine elements of wet, dry, and damp leases to meet specific requirements. Competitive Landscape and Challenges Europe’s ACMI leasing sector operates within a highly competitive environment. The region’s engine maintenance market, which accounts for 22% of global spending from 2025 to 2034, underscores the critical role of maintenance services, even as engine growth in Europe trails the global average. This dynamic is prompting airlines and lessors to pursue strategic partnerships and acquisitions to maintain or expand their market presence. Nevertheless, the market faces challenges stemming from fluctuating demand linked to economic volatility and shifting regulatory frameworks. Airlines are responding by refining their fleet strategies, while lessors are adapting their service offerings to sustain competitiveness. Outlook As the aviation industry continues to evolve, ACMI leasing is anticipated to assume an increasingly central role in enhancing airline resilience, operational adaptability, and sustainability objectives. The market’s projected growth highlights its significance not only for established carriers but also for new entrants seeking cost-effective and flexible fleet solutions in a rapidly changing environment.

Russian Airports to Deploy AI-Based Security Systems Amid Heightened Security Concerns Major airports across Russia are preparing to implement advanced artificial intelligence-driven security systems developed by Ntechlab, a leading Russian facial recognition company currently subject to Western sanctions. According to a report by broadcaster RTVI, the new technology aims to enhance real-time surveillance capabilities by analyzing footage to identify potential security threats more efficiently. Features and Deployment of the AI Security System The AI system is designed to detect a range of security breaches, including unauthorized access to restricted tarmac areas, attempts to circumvent security checkpoints, and improper movements of staff or service vehicles within airport premises. Additionally, the technology can monitor crowd density within terminals, a feature that could prove valuable during peak travel periods. Ntechlab’s CEO, Alexei Palamarchuk, emphasized transportation security as a primary focus of the system’s application. Testing of the system has reportedly been completed at one of Moscow’s four major airports, though the company has not disclosed which facility was involved. Plans to expand the deployment to other airports across Russia have been announced, but no specific timeline or locations have been provided. Context and Controversies Surrounding the Rollout The introduction of this AI-based security system comes amid increased security challenges following recent drone attacks attributed to Ukraine, which disrupted hundreds of flights and inflicted estimated losses of approximately 20 billion rubles (around $250 million) on Russian airlines. These incidents have underscored the urgent need for more sophisticated security measures at transportation hubs. However, the deployment of facial recognition and continuous surveillance technologies has reignited debates over privacy and data protection. Experts caution that the use of such systems in public spaces raises significant concerns about mass surveillance and the potential infringement of individual rights. Ntechlab itself faces sanctions from the United States and the European Union, accused of facilitating mass surveillance and human rights abuses through its technology, which has been employed by Russian authorities. Implications for the AI Security Market The move by Russian airports reflects broader global trends in the AI security sector, which is experiencing rapid growth. Industry analysts forecast a compound annual growth rate of 6.1% in the Cabin Intelligence AI Systems market, driven by increasing demand for advanced security solutions at airports and other transportation hubs. Ntechlab’s entry into this space is expected to intensify competition among AI security providers, encouraging rivals to improve their technologies, especially in light of vulnerabilities revealed by recent incidents involving AI-assisted cyber threats such as “vibe hacking.” As AI technologies continue to evolve, experts stress the importance of ongoing updates and enhancements to security systems to counter increasingly sophisticated cyber-attacks. The challenge for airports and technology developers will be to strike a balance between strengthening security measures and safeguarding privacy, ensuring that the adoption of AI does not compromise fundamental individual rights.

DGCA Orders Mandatory Fuel System Inspections for Boeing 787 and 737 Fleets The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has issued a directive requiring all Indian airlines to conduct thorough inspections of the fuel system locking mechanisms on their Boeing 787 and 737 aircraft. This mandate follows the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau’s (AAIB) report on the recent Air India AI-171 crash, which raised concerns about the operation of the aircraft’s fuel control switches. The AAIB report noted that the engine fuel switches were disengaged prior to the accident, prompting questions about existing safety protocols and cockpit procedures. Airlines are required to complete these inspections and submit detailed reports to regional DGCA offices by July 21. This directive echoes a 2018 advisory from the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which had previously identified risks related to the potential disengagement of fuel control switch locking features on various Boeing models. In light of the AAIB’s findings, several international carriers, including Etihad Airways and Lufthansa, have initiated similar inspections of their Boeing fleets. These airlines have also issued guidance urging pilots to exercise heightened caution when handling fuel control switches, particularly on Boeing 787 aircraft. Industry Response and Ongoing Investigations Despite the increased scrutiny, both the FAA and Boeing have privately assured airlines and regulatory bodies worldwide that there is no immediate safety threat associated with the engines or fuel switch locks on Boeing 787s. Recent inspections have not revealed any significant safety deficiencies within the 787 fleet. Nevertheless, Boeing remains under intense global examination, especially following a separate incident involving the 737 MAX 9. This case is currently under investigation by the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is probing potential regulatory oversights. The AAIB report has ignited debate within the aviation community, particularly concerning the role of the flight crew in the Air India crash. Pilots’ associations have strongly rejected implications that the crew was responsible for the incident, arguing that attributing blame to deceased pilots is unjust. They have called for the inclusion of pilot representatives and technical experts in the ongoing investigation to ensure a fair and comprehensive review. Captain Sam Thomas, president of the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) India, criticized the AAIB report for its lack of transparency and consistency, highlighting that the report was unsigned and selectively leaked. He has advocated for a judicial inquiry involving subject matter experts and pilots, underscoring the complexity of modern aircraft systems. “We don’t have confidence in this report. It creates more confusion and says nothing,” Thomas remarked, disputing suggestions that the pilots intentionally disengaged the fuel switches. He emphasized that verifying fuel control switches is a routine part of the pilot checklist, especially when addressing engine thrust issues. As the DGCA and Indian airlines move forward with the mandated inspections, the aviation sector continues to navigate the delicate balance between stringent safety oversight and demands for transparent, thorough investigations into recent Boeing-related incidents.

FAA Defends Boeing Fuel Switches as South Korea Orders Safety Inspections The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has publicly defended the safety of Boeing aircraft fuel shutoff switches amid increased international scrutiny following a devastating Air India crash near Patna on June 12, which claimed 260 lives. This tragedy has reignited global concerns regarding Boeing’s safety protocols and prompted regulatory actions in several countries. Investigation into Fuel Switches India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has identified the fuel shutoff switches on the aircraft as a potential factor in the crash. Preliminary findings indicate that these switches may have inadvertently shifted from the ‘run’ position to ‘cut-off’ during takeoff, possibly causing a sudden loss of engine power. Boeing had issued a service bulletin in 2018 addressing this component, but it remains uncertain whether the affected aircraft had undergone the recommended updates. This ambiguity has raised questions about compliance and the safety of other Boeing aircraft still in operation worldwide. South Korea’s Precautionary Measures In response to the incident, South Korea’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has mandated comprehensive inspections of all Boeing aircraft operated by national carriers, including Korean Air and Asiana Airlines. Unlike previous measures that focused primarily on the 787 Dreamliner, this directive encompasses the entire Boeing fleet within the country. Although no similar incidents have been reported domestically, South Korean officials have emphasized that the inspections are precautionary, reflecting a broader regulatory trend toward proactive safety oversight. FAA and Boeing Reassurances Despite the ongoing investigation, both the FAA and Boeing have maintained that the current design of the fuel shutoff switches does not present an immediate safety risk. The FAA’s internal Continued Airworthiness Notification affirmed that the fuel switch locks are safe and do not justify grounding aircraft or mandating repairs at this time. However, the agency has indicated that it may revise its guidance based on the final findings of the Indian investigation. Boeing has pledged full cooperation with investigators and is conducting its own review of the switch mechanism as part of its quality assurance processes. Market Response and Investor Confidence In the wake of these developments, Boeing’s stock experienced a brief decline in late June but subsequently rebounded, supported by the FAA’s reassurances and the absence of immediate regulatory action. Market analysts acknowledge that while investor confidence remains relatively steady, uncertainty persists. Should the investigation confirm a design flaw, Boeing could face significant reputational and financial repercussions, compounding challenges from the earlier 737 MAX crisis. Ongoing Investigations and Future Implications The AAIB continues its investigation with assistance from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and other international aviation authorities. A final report is anticipated later this year and may influence future FAA directives and global regulatory policies. Meanwhile, other aviation regulators are expected to consider similar inspections and may press Boeing for enhanced transparency and proactive safety measures. As the investigation progresses, the aviation industry faces a delicate balance between regulatory vigilance and maintaining market confidence, highlighting the critical importance of safety and corporate accountability on a global scale.

DGCA Directs Boeing Fuel System Inspections Following Air India Crash Report Immediate Regulatory Response to Preliminary Findings India’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has issued a directive requiring airlines to conduct urgent inspections of the fuel switch locking systems on Boeing aircraft. This action follows the release of a preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) concerning the crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8. The report revealed that fuel supply to both engines was interrupted within a second of each other shortly after takeoff, raising critical questions about the underlying cause of the accident. The DGCA’s order highlights intensified scrutiny of Boeing’s fuel control switches amid ongoing safety concerns. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Boeing have maintained that the fuel switch locks are reliable and safe, the Indian regulator’s decision underscores the necessity for thorough safety verifications. Inspections conducted so far across Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet have not identified any significant safety defects, according to the DGCA. Industry and Market Reactions Airlines have approached the DGCA’s directive with caution, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive safety checks as investigations proceed. The response within the aviation sector has been varied; some competitors have reaffirmed their commitment to stringent safety protocols, while others have concentrated on operational adjustments to minimize disruptions during the inspection process. Implementing the DGCA’s mandate presents logistical challenges due to the size and complexity of airline fleets. Nonetheless, the regulator has stressed that these inspections are vital to sustaining public confidence in the safety of air travel. Market participants have reacted with uncertainty, closely monitoring developments as the investigation unfolds. The preliminary finding that both engines lost fuel supply almost simultaneously has deepened the mystery surrounding the Air India crash, prompting renewed calls for a detailed review of Boeing’s fuel system design and operational procedures. Commitment to Safety and Transparency As the investigation continues, the DGCA has reaffirmed its dedication to passenger safety and transparency. The regulator has assured the public that all necessary measures are being implemented to address potential risks and prevent similar incidents in the future.

Wizz Air to Cease Operations in Abu Dhabi Amid Regional Challenges Wizz Air, the European low-cost carrier known for its rapid expansion, announced on July 14 that it will terminate its operations in Abu Dhabi effective September 1, 2025. After six years of service in the United Arab Emirates capital, the airline cited a combination of geopolitical instability, operational constraints, supply chain difficulties, and limited market access as the primary reasons for its withdrawal. Strategic Refocus on European Markets Originally established to serve Central and Eastern Europe, Wizz Air has expanded significantly across Western Europe, with substantial operations in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Austria. However, its venture into the Middle Eastern market, centered in Abu Dhabi, failed to meet expectations in terms of profitability and growth. Consequently, the airline’s leadership has decided to concentrate resources on its core European markets, where operational conditions are more favorable and financial returns remain stronger. Challenges Leading to Withdrawal The decision to exit Abu Dhabi is influenced by several critical factors. Persistent geopolitical tensions in the region have resulted in frequent airspace closures, disrupting flight schedules and reducing passenger demand. The harsh Middle Eastern climate has also adversely affected engine performance, posing significant challenges to Wizz Air’s cost-sensitive business model. Furthermore, the airline has encountered ongoing difficulties in securing flying rights for key routes, which has constrained its ability to expand within the region. Compounding these issues are supply chain disruptions that have hindered the airline’s ability to maintain reliable operations in Abu Dhabi. In response, Wizz Air is reportedly negotiating with Airbus to reduce its order of 47 A321XLR long-range aircraft, with the possibility of converting part of the order to standard A321 jets. This adjustment reflects a strategic pivot towards focusing on more viable short- and medium-haul routes within Europe. Implications for the Regional Aviation Market Wizz Air’s departure is expected to alter the competitive dynamics in the Gulf aviation sector. Industry analysts suggest that other carriers may intensify marketing efforts or revise operational strategies to capture the market share vacated by Wizz Air. The airline’s exit could also prompt a broader reassessment of regional connectivity and competition among both low-cost and full-service airlines operating in the Middle East. Despite the challenges faced in Abu Dhabi, Wizz Air remains committed to its European operations, where demand continues to be robust and financial performance remains strong. The airline’s decision highlights the complexities of operating in volatile regions and underscores the necessity for adaptable business strategies within the global aviation industry.

DGCA Mandates Inspection of Fuel Control Switch Locks on Boeing Aircraft by July 21 The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has issued a directive requiring all Indian airlines operating Boeing 787 and 737 aircraft to conduct inspections of the locking mechanisms on their fuel control switches by July 21. This order, released on Monday, underscores the critical importance of adhering to the deadline to maintain the airworthiness and safety of operations. Airlines are also mandated to submit a compliance report within seven days following the completion of these inspections. Background and Rationale for the Directive This directive follows intensified regulatory scrutiny in the wake of the June 12 crash involving an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. The DGCA’s announcement came shortly after reports indicated that some operators had already initiated checks on the fuel switch locks of Boeing 787 aircraft. A DGCA official clarified that the order applies exclusively to airlines that own these Boeing models, excluding those operating leased aircraft. The mandate is grounded in findings from the preliminary investigation into the Air India accident, which referenced a 2018 advisory issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). That advisory highlighted potential malfunctions in the fuel control switches of certain Boeing 737 and 787 models, recommending inspections to prevent inadvertent movement of the switches. However, the FAA did not designate the issue as an “unsafe condition,” and inspections were not made compulsory at that time. According to the preliminary report, Air India did not perform inspections following the 2018 FAA advisory, as there was no regulatory requirement to do so. The airline informed investigators that it had replaced the cockpit module containing the fuel control switches twice—once in 2019 and again in 2023—on the aircraft involved in the recent crash. These replacements, however, were unrelated to the fuel switch concerns. Implications for Airlines and the Aviation Industry The DGCA’s directive now imposes a mandatory inspection regime for specific Boeing models to address any potential vulnerabilities in the fuel control switch locking mechanisms. This requirement poses operational challenges for airlines, including ensuring timely compliance across their fleets, rectifying any identified issues, and managing potential disruptions to flight schedules. The order is likely to attract heightened attention from investors and passengers alike, while competing carriers may leverage the situation to emphasize their own safety standards and protocols. Internationally, prominent carriers such as Etihad Airways and Singapore Airlines have also commenced inspections of fuel switch locks on their Boeing 787 fleets. Both the FAA and Boeing continue to assert that the fuel switch locks are safe, which may help mitigate some concerns within the industry. Nonetheless, investigations into the Air India crash remain ongoing, with the global aviation community closely monitoring developments.